作者認為，儘管英美之間的貿易意義非凡，但他推測拜登政府或會對歐美貿易更感興趣。當然，這都是未知之數。隨著美國新政府向歐洲世界的發展，歐洲和跨大西洋關係將更令人拭目以待。
The following content is provided by IFIMES
(Author: Prof. J.Scott Younger)
編輯摘要:
3月8日，International Institute for Middle East and Balkan Studies (IFIMES)、Media Platform Modern Diplomacy、Scientific Journal European Perspectives和Action Platform Culture for Peace在維也納舉行國際峰會，眾多國際事務專家雲集，討論美國、歐盟、英國不斷變動的「三角關係」。
拜登政府首要面對的問題是面對特朗普時代遺留下來的白人至上主義、美國優先主義、恐怖主義等。拜登政府需要重新讓美國成為國際多樣性的一份子，或需要重新與北約、世界衛生組織、環保組織溝通。另一方面，隨著英國成功脫歐，首相約翰遜希望與拜登政府達成貿易協議。
作者認為，儘管英美之間的貿易意義非凡，但他推測拜登政府或會對歐美貿易更感興趣。當然，這都是未知之數。隨著美國新政府向歐洲世界的發展，歐洲和跨大西洋關係將更令人拭目以待。
The US, UK and the EU – Triangle of variable geometry
On the historic date of March 08th – International Women’s Day, a large number of international affairs specialists gathered for the second consecutive summit in Vienna, Austria. This leg of the Vienna Process event titled: “Europe – Future – Neighbourhood at 75: Disruptions Recalibration Continuity”. The conference, jointly organized by four different entities (the International Institute for Middle East and Balkan Studies IFIMES, Media Platform Modern Diplomacy, Scientific Journal European Perspectives, and Action Platform Culture for Peace) with the support of the Diplomatic Academy of Vienna, was aimed at discussing the future of Europe and its neighbourhood in the wake of its old and new challenges.
Among other notable speakers was also the International Chancellor of the President University, Schott Younger. Following lines are his contribution to this highly successful Vienna Process event:
I want to address two distinct areas, namely the political sphere and trade.
The USA has been in somewhat of a turmoil in the past few years, marked by the years of the Trump presidency which brought it to a head. It highlighted that there was an underlying white supremacy movement which went back to the Civil War Years, the mid 1800s, and only needed a maverick President, as Trump was, to bring it to the fore. This has not gone away. In fact, the FBI are more worried by the white supremacy movements for domestic terrorism than the international variety. Trump, having survived two impeachments, and with a weak, somewhat docile, Republican party, he will try to take it over and cause problems for the Democrats and Biden.
This will be one significant issue that Biden will face in his 4-year term and he will have to address that. One can only hope that Trump’s time will be absorbed by defending back taxes owed and shady deals. The USA, however, will re-engage with NATO, WHO and Climate Change and other bodies which Trump withdrew the USA from.
However, Biden is going to struggle whenever he comes up against the stateswide judiciary or the Supreme Court when it comes to having important decisions passed and where Trump has placed arch conservatives. Therefore, I am not hopeful that Biden will be able to attend to as much as he would like on trans-Atlantic matters.
With Brexit done, the new American administration now have two entities to think about., UK and the EU. With Johnson as Prime Minister Trump considered he had a good rapport with the UK, and one could conceive that a top priority would have been a trade deal with the UK, although UK people had misgivings over some important contents of the deal, the outline of which was up for preliminary discussion. The trade between UK and US, although not as high as between Britain and Europe, is significant. But Biden is more ambivalent despite the closeness of the relationship; his forebears are Irish! I think that Biden would be interested in the Europe-US trade option. My caveat would be that there would be many things to discuss and several years to bring anything to a conclusion. Some key standards are different. The two deals, with EU and UK, could be run in parallel but I don ‘t see them coming to fruition in the near term.
This next puts attention on the EU-UK trade deal which was hastily signed up at the eleventh hour by Johnson, as he promised, although the deal that he signed was little different from that of 6 months previously. This then draws attention to the promises made by the Brexiteers in 2016. Little by little it is coming out that the message that they gave to the British people was full of holes. Not to put to fine a point on it they spoke a lot of terminal inexactitudes, to quote Churchill when he was pulled up for saying that someone was lying in the House of Commons. Unparliamentary language! This is gradually going to come out and there will be a lot of unhappy people. There is much to blame Cameron and other Remainers for. They assumed that there was no problem and went to sleep and let Farage vent and Brexiteers tell their untruths unchallenged. We have not seen the end of this at this juncture. The demographics are changing in Britain, most of the younger people want change, and the outer parts that make up the UK are restive, particularly in the north, Scotland. That is another story. The UK might be different at the end of the decade!
In summary, Europe and trans-Atlantic relations will be easier with the new US administration pulling in the same direction, with the US rejoining the western World, and behaving more in tune with what most of Europe espouses to be. If the trans-Atlantic link is improving diplomatically this will make it easier to push the important agendas which should exercise the minds of those in positions to do this, namely the ongoing muddle which is the Middle East and the disgrace of a humanitarian situation, an aggressive China with a dictatorial touch but still open to trade with Europe, as well as India and ASEAN and Africa.
Today, Europe is ideally placed to trade with places East. There is an attempt to open up the old Silk Road and China is not averse to promote its use. A railway link has been established between China and right across Europe. This can cut the journey time by sea by as much as 2/3rds. Further the rail connections to ASEAN are improving
The EU has a vital leadership part to play in World affairs and is ideally placed to do it. The question is will they embrace the opportunity?
About the author:
Prof. J.Scott Younger, OBE. International Chancellor of the President University. IFIMES Advisory Board.
假如對以上有興趣，你可能會希望知道更多：
Coronabond還是Eurobond？爭議背後武漢肺炎帶來的財政負擔是歐元區整合的跳板
英國外交部 ”吞倂“ 國際發展部門對於國際發展事務是好是壞？